When Government Gets It Right: How Federal IT Leaders Can Deliver Greater Value

The stereotype of government agencies—inefficient buyers of overpriced services and obsolete technology—may not be as deserved as it once was. Even state Departments of Motor Vehicles, often held up as the poster child of government bureaucracy and inefficiency, have become streamlined with newer technology and easier-to-use, online services.

The shift began to happen in earnest in 2014, when Congress passed the Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act (FITARA), a law that represented the first major overhaul of federal IT in nearly 20 years. FITARA makes it easier for the government to control costs, not by cutting services, but by making agencies more efficient.


Click to read the white paper

This year, in response to FITARA, the TBM Council, advocates of the emerging practice of Technology Business Management; the Office of Management and Budget; and the Deputy Administrator for E-Government and Information Technology came together to create the IT COST Commission Report, showing how the U.S. government could achieve nearly $6 billion in technology cost savings and improved efficiency.

According to the Commission’s report, about 75 percent of the FY2017 budget for federal IT spending is devoted to operations and maintenance—just maintaining the status quo—with only about 25 percent of the budget dedicated to development, modernization and enhancements.

Whether in a public or private organization, when a CEO asks “what are we spending on IT, what’s it for and what good is it doing us?” the answers are often buried. A key part of success is a standardized IT costing taxonomy, a basic tenet of TBM, which creates a standard language for describing what IT delivers, what it costs and provides benchmarking data that tells you whether you’re doing it better than—or as well as—your peers.

The IT COST Commission report makes 21 distinct recommendations for federal agency CIOs, from benchmarking significant IT tower and sub-tower costs on an annual basis to better aligning reporting between the CIOs and CFOs of each federal agency office and the OMB. Ultimately, the goal is to help public sector CIOs transform their organizations from overseeing IT maintenance to becoming a key enabler and transparent broker of services.

To take a deeper look at what the IT COST Commission’s recommendations mean for public agencies, read our newly released white paper, TBM and the Public Sector: An Overview of the IT COST Commission and FITARA. Or contact me directly to discuss how ISG can help.

ISG is an alliance partner of the TBM Council and a sponsor of the TBM Conference November 7-10 in San Diego. Look for us there.

Alex-Paul Manders

About Alex-Paul Manders

TBM Practice Lead, Americas. LinkedIn: Alex-Paul Manders Twitter: @AP_Manders
No comments yet.

Leave a Reply